All Rights Reserved.  BetterElections123 copyright 2012.
First Past the Post
minority rule elections
first_past_post_2.jpg
The current First-Past-the-Post (FPP) election system used in the United States of America for electing most of its government officials does not allow the opportunity for all to be represented, nor for majority rule.
 
The term "first past the post" is derived from horse-racing and most American elections are also referred to as "the winner takes all".  If the "winner who took all" was not someone you voted for, chances are you have no representation in your own government. 
 
In this voting system the single winner is the person with the most votes; many elections have no requirement that the winner gain an absolute majority of overall votes.  Votes not cast for the winner are called "wasted votes" because they do not help to elect a government official. 
 
Where only two candidates are contesting election to a single seat (for such offices as Mayor or Governor), the result with the rare exception of a tie is bound to be a majority - the winner gaining support from more than 50% of the voters. 
 
When three or more candidates vie for a single office, there are three possible outcomes.  One is that one of the candidates achieves majority support and is therefore elected.  Second is that the first place finisher will have less than a majority of support, but will be declared elected by virtue of have gained more votes than any other candidate.  The third outcome is that a runoff election will be called between the two candidates who gained the most votes. 
 
The problem in the second instance (election by plurality rather than majority) is that most voters will have opposed the candidate who is declared elected.  Perhaps supporters of the third place candidate would have preferred the second place option to the first.  A majority of voters may find this an unsatisfactory outcome. 
 
The problem in the third instance (additional election for runoff purposes) is that this adds the cost of government administration of a second election for filling a single office, and that it also adds campaign costs to the candidates who advance to the runoff round.  Plus, in a standard runoff mudslinging often ensues. 
 
These problems can be avoided by enacting:
 
 
Instant Runoff Voting
Home   [   Current Election System   [   Gerrymandering   [   Charts
Instant Runoff Voting   [   Proportional Representation   [   Single Transferable Vote   [  MMP   [   Party List System
The Initiative Process   [   Links   [   About BetterElections123   [   FAQ   [   Contact   [   Volunteers   [   Donate
Click on picture to watch video